For Every Fetish there is a Pervert or Milo What Have you done, Now ?

                                For Every Fetish, there is a Pervert or Milo What Have you done Now?

Oh, Milo what have you done now? or more precisely Oh Milo what have you said now? Is what he said a hanging offense? Well, yes it seems so maybe not a physical hanging offense but certainly a career hanging offense.  One may lose one's job, be denied apartments, have their kids denied preschool, lose their business, turned down by coop boards etc. all because one holds, speaks,  or even has religious beliefs contrary to the "established norms". What was his crime exactly?

At first glance, it looks as though he questioned our society's attitude regarding pedophilia.  Now let me be perfectly clear here I abhor pedophilia, and pederasts I think they should be executed! Not castrated, chemically or otherwise, not imprisoned,  not rehabilitated, executed! in the most cost-efficient way possible. "There was a hateful video that was disseminated on the internet " Susan Rice call your service where Milo (I am not writing out Mr. Yiannopoulos ) This interview implied that Milo condoned pedophilia. This is a lie - I have watched the video being disseminated  It is amalgamation with clipped editing where the contents of and the Milo's appearance on  the Joe Rogan #702 Sept 30, 2015  where he talked about how he lost his virginity when he was 13/14  -  and a second video,   The Drunken Peasants January 4th, 2016 )  where the previous conversation was recalled and later a completely different topic regarding the included the nature of consent between graduate students and college professors through  selective editing and clipping of the between two separate shows appearances and three distinct conversations became  one  in which it seems that Milo condoned pedophilia!

WTF

Milo was talking about how he lost his virginity, how he was abused by older men - Milo was talking about himself, his experience, his consent. Now one may believe that at 13/14 no one not even Milo is capable of consenting to sex - I know I do - even Milo says he supports the consent laws as is. Various new outlets - the usual suspect CNN, Huffington, Slate etc have decided to take the fake tape and run with it as if it were news. Why would they do this is it a high tech lynching of an uppity "Dangerous Faggot" - who dared to speak views contrary to the defined orthodoxy?  Could this have nothing to do with Milo per see but part of the campaign to slow the DT administration down,  first Candy Crowley, then Flynn, now since they cant go after the administration they go after its' public supporters? In the last 48 hours Milo has lost his job, endorsements, speaking engagements, and book deal. He has made a public mia culpa too bad Oprah is not still on the air he could have done an Oprah walk of shame.  

Maybe it is all about Milo. Milo who has dared say what has been unspeakable that given his choice he would choose not to be gay. Milo who despite being abused by a Catholic Priests gave a 1.5-hour talk titled "The Catholic Church is Right about Everything"  Milo who has dared to state that for his own survival he must be Islamophobic. Milo who while claims to love women and stand for equal rights is opposed what he calls modern postmodern feminist fascism. 

Or is the pearl-clutching, bun tightening reaction about something else? Is it about patting ourselves on the back making us self-secure in our virtue. Or at least our virtue signaling, we all feel better and safer in our own self-righteousness that at least we would never dream of saying the things he said - even though he did not say them! We live in a time and a culture where in my lifetime what was porn hidden in a trunk in my brother's room has become advertising. Public schools providing sex ed in primary school to students younger than when Milo was assaulted. Public institutions, large corporations, NCAA and even NFL threaten sanctions against states which want to ban grown men dressed as women from sharing bathrooms with girls.   None of the great and the good, the celebrated, and lauded have lost anytime gloated over the fall of Milo and the striking of poses of outrage and shock. This is despite giving their own the  Allen's, Polanski's, and Dunham's and Lord Knows who else in their milieu a pass, lifetime achievement, and Emmy awards. The comfortable righteousness of CPAC  and other "conservatives" who distance themselves from the falling Milo star - yet support the Ted Nugent's off this world.  Now let's be clear I have not given Milo a pass,  he did speak using gay jargon - which means something completely different to the straight world. Much in the same that ethnic minorities will use words amongst ourselves which we would feel anger and outrage if anyone else did. But even here I must point out that those words were takes out of context, repackaged, and weaponized against him. All the time forgetting that Milo was the 13/14-year-old boy who was abused. He was the victim, and now just for being what he is and thinking the way he does he is being made a victim again.